AWS vs Azure UK Compliance 2025 comparison

AWS vs Azure UK Compliance 2025 - Which Cloud Provider Meets ICO Requirements?

3 min read

UK enterprises face a consequential choice between AWS and Azure for cloud infrastructure. Both providers offer comprehensive compliance programmes with 100+ certifications, but meaningful differences in UK data residency, default encryption, and regional pairing affect ICO compliance posture. This analysis compares the providers across security controls, certifications, and pricing to inform UK CIO decision-making.

CTC
Written by CTC Editorial Editorial Team

The UK Cloud Compliance Landscape in 2025

UK enterprises selecting between Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure must weigh compliance capabilities against the backdrop of evolving UK data protection law. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, which came into force in June 2025, introduces nuanced changes to UK GDPR whilst the ICO continues robust enforcement.

Both providers maintain comprehensive compliance programmes. AWS supports 143 security standards and compliance certifications, whilst Azure offers over 100 compliance offerings. For UK-specific requirements, the distinction lies not in breadth but in implementation detail and ecosystem integration.

UK Data Residency: Region Comparison

Both providers operate dedicated UK infrastructure, though architectural differences affect disaster recovery and availability patterns:

AWS eu-west-2 (London): Three availability zones within a single UK region. AWS pairs London with Dublin (eu-west-1) for cross-region replication, meaning DR configurations may involve data leaving UK borders unless explicitly restricted.

Azure UK South and UK West: Two UK regions paired together, enabling geo-redundant disaster recovery entirely within UK borders. UK South offers three availability zones; UK West currently operates without AZs but serves as the paired DR region.

For organisations requiring strict UK-only data residency, Azure's UK region pairing provides a distinct advantage. AWS customers must implement additional controls to prevent data replication to Dublin.

ICO Compliance and UK GDPR Controls

The Information Commissioner's Office requires organisations to demonstrate accountability under UK GDPR Article 5(2). Both providers offer compliance tooling, though approaches differ:

AWS Compliance Approach:

  • UK GDPR Addendum incorporated into AWS Service Terms automatically

  • CISPE Code of Conduct certification for 100+ services

  • AWS Artifact for on-demand compliance documentation

  • Granular IAM controls with AWS Organizations SCPs

  • AWS Config rules for continuous compliance monitoring

Azure Compliance Approach:

  • Microsoft Data Protection Addendum with UK-specific provisions

  • EU Data Boundary controls extended to UK regions

  • Customer Lockbox preventing Microsoft engineer data access

  • Azure Policy for organisation-wide compliance enforcement

  • Microsoft Purview for data governance and classification

Certification and Accreditation Comparison

For UK public sector procurement, both providers meet essential requirements. Shared certifications include ISO 27001, 27017, 27018, 27701, SOC 1/2/3 Type II, Cyber Essentials Plus, G-Cloud 14, and PCI DSS Level 1.

AWS Differentiators: NCSC Cloud Security Principles attestation, forthcoming AWS European Sovereign Cloud, FIPS 140-2/140-3 validated cryptographic modules.

Azure Differentiators: HITRUST CSF certification, Azure Government UK for higher classifications, deeper Microsoft 365 integration for unified compliance.

Security Controls: Encryption and Access

AWS: Encryption at rest is not enabled by default for all services. Organisations must explicitly enable encryption for S3 buckets, EBS volumes, and RDS instances. AWS KMS provides key management with CloudHSM available for FIPS 140-2 Level 3 requirements.

Azure: AES-256 encryption enabled by default for most services. Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) automatically protects Azure SQL databases. Azure Key Vault integrates natively with Microsoft services, reducing configuration complexity.

For UK enterprises with limited cloud security expertise, Azure's default-on encryption reduces the risk of misconfiguration—a common factor in ICO enforcement actions.

Pricing and Cost Considerations

UK region pricing for both providers carries approximately 10% premium over US regions. Direct cost comparison depends heavily on workload patterns:

  • Storage: Azure typically 15-20% cheaper for blob storage in UK regions

  • Compute: AWS offers more granular instance sizing; Azure provides better value for Reserved Instances with Microsoft EA

  • Egress: Both charge similar rates; Azure offers free egress to Microsoft 365 services

  • Hybrid Benefit: Azure Hybrid Benefit can reduce costs 40%+ for organisations with existing Windows Server/SQL licences

Recommendation Framework for UK CIOs

Choose AWS when: Your organisation operates multi-cloud architecture, requires the broadest service catalogue (200+ services), has high DevOps maturity, or runs primarily Linux-based workloads.

Choose Azure when: Your organisation relies heavily on Microsoft 365/Dynamics 365, UK-only disaster recovery is required, you hold Microsoft Enterprise Agreements, need hybrid cloud with on-premises Windows Server, or prefer default encryption with simpler compliance controls.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is better for UK GDPR compliance?

Both providers meet UK GDPR requirements comprehensively. Azure offers slight advantages with default encryption and UK-only disaster recovery pairing. AWS provides more granular controls for organisations with mature cloud security teams.

Can I keep all data within UK borders on AWS?

Yes, but with caveats. AWS eu-west-2 (London) stores data in the UK, but default cross-region replication pairs with Dublin. You must explicitly configure services to prevent EU replication if strict UK-only residency is required.

Does Azure encrypt data by default?

Yes. Azure enables AES-256 encryption at rest by default for most services, including Storage Accounts and Azure SQL. AWS requires explicit encryption enablement for many services, increasing misconfiguration risk.

Which provider is cheaper for UK deployments?

It depends on workload. Azure typically offers better storage pricing and significant discounts via Azure Hybrid Benefit for Microsoft licence holders. AWS provides more compute instance variety and competitive spot pricing.

Are both providers on G-Cloud 14?

Yes. Both AWS and Azure maintain extensive G-Cloud 14 listings via Crown Commercial Service, enabling streamlined procurement for UK public sector organisations.

How do the providers handle ICO breach notification?

Both providers commit to notifying customers of security incidents affecting their data. Azure offers Microsoft Defender for Cloud with 72-hour alerting workflows. AWS provides Security Hub and GuardDuty for threat detection.

Which is better for UK public sector?

Azure tends to dominate UK public sector due to Microsoft 365 ubiquity and Azure Government UK offerings. However, AWS powers significant HMRC and NHS Digital workloads. Both are viable.

What certifications should I look for?

For UK compliance: ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, and G-Cloud listing are essential. For financial services, add SOC 2 Type II and PCI DSS. For healthcare, verify NHS DSPT alignment.

About the Author

CTC
CTC Editorial

Editorial Team

The Compare the Cloud editorial team brings you expert analysis and insights on cloud computing, digital transformation, and emerging technologies.